
Originally Posted by
Mr. Miyagi
I agree about 90% to the 'homosexuality is not a choice,' statement, only because I do believe there is at least 10%, if not more than that, of cases where it's environmental or influenced by others past adolescence.
I studied homosexuality in Psychology, and there were plenty of theories surrounding it. The resounding lesson was that it 'was not a choice,' but the theories themselves varied.
One theory was that it was hormonal, as we studied many cases with families that had many sons, and that the youngest son was typically homosexual. The conclusion was that after producing a certain amount of sons, women do not produce the same testosterone in the womb that is needed for developing male embryos. The idea was that estrogen substituted in for the testosterone.
Another theory was that homosexuals had a part of their brain that was enlarged. Unfortunately I forgot what the name of this part of the brain was, but it was the theory that seemed to make the most sense to me. Unfortunately the only way to research it was to cut open the brains of deceased homosexuals, so there isn't going to be too much on this study for a while.
Now, I am entirely on the fence about bi-sexuality, because I feel that it's just a rare phenomenon in the cases that it's a truly instinctual decision. I'd equate true bi-sexuality to being about as common as hermaphrodites, which is something I need to add more into this debate. In almost ALL of the instances I've experienced bi-sexuality it was with people who were doing it for attention, or were doing it because society seems to frown upon homosexuality, but bisexuality, hey, that's hot!
Now, I like to think that the only reason that homosexuality is so highly debated in terms of it 'being a choice,' or not, is because it has no physical attributes to it, like being a hermaphrodite for example. No one questions the existence of hermaphrodites, nor do they wave the 'evil' word around, because it's a physical, genetic mutation that people can see and therefore have proof of. I believe it's because of this that people search for 'concrete proof' that homosexuals are gay because of some chemical or genetic reason. That way they feel like they can sweep it under the rug and blame it on bad genes, instead of a plethora of environment findings.
Just like there's no set rule for why people are attracted to certain people, I don't think there's a set 'reason' for people being homosexual. There's always different scenarios and circumstances, and just like how people are all very different, as are homosexuals. There's the feminine ones, there's the masculine ones, there's the ones who will lie to themselves throughout their entire lives, even get married, and later on in life will admit they're gay and seek out a same-gendered companionship. It's such a complex thing that I don't think we've really scratched the surface when it comes to figuring what makes it happen.
I could go on about this forever, but I'll end this post here for now. xD Yay for glad bags!
Bookmarks