But it is damn-near impossible for the audience to separate the two.
Not because they don't want to, but because humans by default have these things called—you may have heard of them—emotions and beliefs. I know that saying that you can separate an artist and their work is the cool or "right" thing to do as a rational human being, but being unable to separate them is perfectly normal, perfectly just, and perfectly human.
One thing that comes to mind is this Orson Scott Card situation and his views on homosexuality and same sex marriage. The lot of us are here are familiar with his work and his legacy, and that's what we love him for. That's what we should love him for. But his views are a problem for a lot of people who think differently, and as such they are no longer able to read or support anything he does. Is this wrong? I don't think so.
People that feel like others are stupid for being unable to separate an artist from their art are insensitive (that's nice speak for "asshole"), simple and plain. Because none of them ever put themselves in the shoes of the offended. I mean, think about it. Imagine being a Jewish person with a deep rooted pride in your heritage. Imagine having a love for Hemmingway novels. Now, imagine your friend tells you that hey may have been an anti-semite. You would flip out! You'd search every page on the Internet to find evidence pointing away from that possible fact, just so you could continue reading and enjoying his work.
And I threw "pride" in that example for a reason, because in a case like that being Jewish isn't enough. It would be for some people, but not all. Not most. Because what are some of the things people care about most? Their beliefs. Their ethics. That's reason enough to kick your favorite artist to the curb for something they've done. And to say that it's stupid or ignorant for anyone to do that is insensitive and mechanical.
Hell, a lot of the times when people say those things it's about issues they don't particularly care about. You've witnessed this kind of thing before. You perhaps even experienced it.
Remember when Sean Connery said that it was OK to slap a woman in the mouth if she didn't shut up? There were three different reactions from three different types of people. You had the people that were completely outrated by it, the people who didn't give a damn, and the people who did not really agree but were not affected by it too much. The latter two can probably watch Sean Connery flicks ad nauseam, and maybe throw a wife beating joke or two while they're at it. Why? Because it doesn't linger too far ahead of their own system of beliefs and ethics. I'm willing to bet that the majority of the folks that didn't know about Sean Connery's "Smack-A-Bitch" creed before reading this can go back watch any movie he's ever been in with little to no problem.
To finally end this (LOL), I'll just say that it's perfectly fine if you don't like Brad Pitt anymore because you think he's a cheating scum bag, or if you can't bring yourself to watch Seinfeld re-runs because Michael Richards is a racist asshole, or if you refuse to invest money in anything involving Disney because Walt Disney hated the Jews. It's OK. It's rational. It's human.
Discuss.




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks